Robotics in Distribution Centers: Where Automation Helps, Where It Hurts, and How to Keep Control
- Feb 13, 2026
- Autonomous Robots
If you run a distribution center, you have two clocks running at once. One clock is throughput: how many lines you can ship before cutoff. The other clock is accuracy: how many of those lines you ship without creating a customer problem tomorrow.
Robotics in distribution centers gets pitched as a simple answer to both clocks. Sometimes it is, and sometimes it is not. Robotics helps when it removes wasted motion and strengthens control, but it hurts when it is layered onto weak data and vague exception workflows.
Some DCs run high volume, low variety, and repeatable picks. Others run high SKU counts, mixed unit profiles, and constant change from promotions and retail programs. Robotics can fit both, but the design needs to match the reality of the building.
A useful way to think about robotics is as a tool that changes where labor is spent. It reduces walking and searching, but it also increases the need for scan discipline and system alignment. If your DC already struggles with inventory truth, robotics will expose that struggle quickly.
In many distribution centers, paid time disappears into walking, cart pushing, and congestion. That time feels productive because people are moving, but it does not create shipped orders. Robotics often earns its first ROI by converting travel minutes into pick minutes.
Holly Woods, Director of Operations at G10 Fulfillment, says, "The robots are allowing efficiency with pick paths." As Holly adds, "They're lowering fatigue on employees." Reduced fatigue matters because tired teams make more mistakes late in the shift. When mistakes rise, your DC looks fast today and expensive tomorrow.
Distribution center speed is usually lost in handoffs. Picking finishes, then packing waits, then shipping docks get flooded late in the day. Robotics improves speed when it makes the flow steadier instead of merely faster in one corner.
Holly also notes, "We've seen great efficiency gains in picks per line or lines per hour." Steady output keeps downstream stations productive and reduces end-of-day piles. That is how a DC hits cutoffs without buying overtime and hoping the last trailer makes it out.
Robotics increases tempo, which increases the cost of sloppy habits. If inventory can move without scans, system truth drifts away from physical truth. Drift creates scavenger hunts, and scavenger hunts are pure waste.
Connor Perkins, Director of Fulfillment at G10 Fulfillment, says, "You want everything to be scanned in the warehouse, nothing done on paper." That is the operational definition of control. When everything is scanned, problems become diagnosable instead of mysterious, and the DC can improve rather than improvise.
Robots move work, but the WMS keeps inventory real. If the WMS only updates at a few checkpoints, ghost inventory appears and supervisors become detectives. That is a bad trade, because detective work does not ship orders.
Bryan Wright, CTO and COO at G10 Fulfillment, explains, "A good WMS tracks inventory through the warehouse at every point that you touch it." Bryan adds, "So there's this completely next level of tracking that occurs within that good WMS versus a not good WMS." Deep tracking makes robotics sustainable because it turns errors into traceable events. Traceability reduces blame fights and replaces them with fixes.
Empty pick locations are throughput killers because they appear mid-wave. When a picker hits an empty bin, the wave slows, exceptions multiply, and supervisors get pulled into triage. The building feels busy, but shipping slows down.
A robotic design that ignores replenishment is an incomplete design. Replenishment triggers, priorities, and completion scans need to be part of the same system, otherwise robotics will simply deliver faster trips to empty shelves.
No distribution center lives on the happy path. Barcodes fail, product gets damaged, and retail requirements change. Robotics surfaces exceptions faster, which is useful only if there is a defined path to resolve them.
Defined exception workflows have ownership and timing. They also have closure, meaning the system gets updated so the problem does not reappear as a new surprise tomorrow.
In B2B distribution, the shipment must be correct and compliant. Label rules, carton content rules, ASNs, and routing guides are where DCs get penalized. Robotics can help by making flow steadier, but it cannot replace compliance discipline.
The best robotic DCs build compliance checks into the workflow. When compliance steps are verified through scans and system logic, speed becomes safer, not riskier.
Wrong shipments create reships, returns, customer support work, and inventory correction. Those tasks consume future capacity that could have shipped new orders. In that sense, errors are negative productivity.
Connor also says, "So they were losing money by shipping wrong items or wrong quantities of items." If robotics makes you faster but less accurate, you did not improve. You moved cost downstream and guaranteed more work later.
In a 3PL distribution center, there is rarely a steady state. Multiple clients share the same floor, and each brings different catalogs, packaging rules, and service expectations. Variability is where rigid systems break.
Bryan also says, "We have an ability to configure our system to the customer very quickly." Fast configuration keeps the system aligned with client reality. When updates lag, the floor invents workarounds, and workarounds are where inventory truth disappears.
Robotics is not implemented by a purchase order. The floor decides whether the workflow is real when pressure rises. If the system reduces wasted steps and clarifies work, adoption tends to stick.
Maureen also says, "The warehouse employees are really embracing this technology, and they're seeing the benefit of it as well." Adoption shows up in scan compliance, exception resolution timing, and steady throughput across shifts. Those boring signals predict whether peak will be controlled or chaotic.
Before you approve robotics in a distribution center, ask where time is actually being lost today. Ask how the system will handle empty locations, damaged goods, and late inbound without drifting away from inventory truth. Those answers reveal whether the plan is a real operating system or a demo script.
Also ask what changes look like after go-live. New SKUs, new retailer rules, and new order profiles are guaranteed, so the question is how fast the floor can adapt without losing control. A good answer is a workflow you can inspect, not a promise you are expected to accept.
G10 was founded in 2009 and specializes in B2B and D2C e-commerce, retail, wholesale, and HAZMAT-compliant fulfillment. Robotics is applied where it reduces wasted motion and supports steady flow, backed by scan discipline and deep visibility through ChannelPoint WMS.
Maureen also says, "And in the 3PL business these days everything's immediate, just in time." Maureen Milligan, Director of Operations and Projects at G10 Fulfillment, says, "We've seen fabulous results, a huge increase in productivity." If you want robotics in distribution centers that improves throughput without losing control, talk with G10 about your order mix, your exception patterns, and your compliance requirements. You will get a practical plan that connects robotics, WMS visibility, and floor workflows so more correct orders ship on time.
Transform your fulfillment process with cutting-edge integration. Our existing processes and solutions are designed to help you expand into new retailers and channels, providing you with a roadmap to grow your business.
Since 2009, G10 Fulfillment has thrived by prioritizing technology, continually refining our processes to deliver dependable services. Since our inception, we've evolved into trusted partners for a wide array of online and brick-and-mortar retailers. Our services span wholesale distribution to retail and E-Commerce order fulfillment, offering a comprehensive solution.